The details in DOT’s draft plan could change before toll collection starts, O’Connor said. The current plan calls for placing overhead toll collection sensors at nine locations on I-95, about every 20 miles from the border. Drivers who carry toll transponders will be charged a 20-mile toll each time they pass beneath the I-95 sensors. For vehicles without transponders, cameras will record license numbers and the owners will be billed by mail, at a higher toll rate. The easiest way to avoid tolls would be to exit I-95 just before reaching the overhead sensors, then drive a few miles on nearby U.S. 301, and return to I-95 at the next interchange. But at the exits closest to each set of overhead sensors, DOT plans to install the same technology. A car taking that last off-ramp from I-95 before the toll sensor will be charged for a 10-mile toll, and a car entering at the next on-ramp also will be charged for 10 miles. Meanwhile, at other exits – all exits except the ones closest to the I-95 sensors – drivers would be able to get on and off the interstate without having to pay. “You could go from Dunn to I-40 and Raleigh and not be tolled,” said Dunn Mayor Oscar N. Harris. “So that is a lot of our driving around here. But if you want to drive to Fayetteville, you would be tolled.
Crystal Collins, president of the Raleigh-based N.C. Trucking Association, attended a DOT hearing in Lumberton and told O’Connor that her group opposes the toll proposal. “We oppose tolls on existing roads,” Collins said in an interview. “We’re already paying taxes to have the roads we have today maintained. You’re paying for it again.” A DOT study estimates that 20 to 25 percent of I-95 drivers will find other roads, to avoid the tolls. But the state figures it still can collect enough money to pay for the construction, if tolls are collected for about 40 years.
(Bruce Siceloff, THE NEWS & OBSERVER, 2/12/12).

