Building liveable cities for NC’s future.
News Archives
ltColExample
Our Mission
To promote strategies to advance North Carolina’s urban centers.

CITIES IN OUR COALITION

Posts Tagged ‘Yadkin River Bridge’

State Budget Discussions and Equity 6.28.10

Monday, June 28th, 2010

The House and Senate came to an agreement on the budget over the weekend (see article link below). While the final language has not yet been released, I am hearing that the Mobility Fund was included in the budget, but without the supplemental Powell Bill and Interstate Maintenance money. While just rumor at this point, I will send you the final language when released later today or tomorrow.

The rumored plan is to vote on the bill Tuesday and Wednesday and send to the Governor for her signature before the end of the fiscal year.

Discussions of changing the equity formula became a part of the budget negotiations. Senator Nesbitt of Buncombe County advocated that they include an exemption to the state’s transportation equity formula in the budget for the Appalachian Development Highway System federal monies. (See how the exemption would affect your highway division here.)  The monies date back to 1965 when Congress designated the federal funds to be spent on the Appalachian Highway System. But, because the monies are required by state law to flow through the equity formula, they are, in effect, spent across the State. Here is an excerpt from an Asheville Citizen Times article on the issue:
“More than $30 million a year is earmarked for the highway system…but the money is going unused because of the way state and federal legislators hand it out. North Carolina law doesn’t allow spending in a region to tilt the formula for spreading road money equitably across the state. So for every dollar that highways like U.S. 74 receive in Appalachian Development Highway System funds, the far-western region has to give up 96 cents in other road funding. That’s because of how the General Assembly wrote the formula and because Congress doesn’t provide extra money for the mountain highways; it simply sets aside for them a slice of the money North Carolina would normally get to build all state highways.” (Asheville Citizen Times, 9/29/09)

The Appalachian Development Highway System monies, if exempted from the State Transportation Equity Formula, will be spent only in Graham, Cherokee, and Clay counties in highway division 14.  The total new monies that will be taken from all the other highway divisions and spent in division 14 over a seven year period represent a 75% increase in federal construction highway dollars for division 14.  (according to the table above provided by NCDOT)

Additionally, Rep. Hugh Holliman of Davidson County advocated that the first phase of the Yadkin River Bridge project be exempted from the formula. (Phase I is the actual bridge, while Phase II is to widen I-85 north of the bridge included as the first Mobility Fund project.)

There are rumors that the Appalachian Development Highway System funds were exempted from the equity formula in the budget bill. I am told there was much discussion around the issue, and the argument was successfully made that the urban areas had the loop money exempted, so this was in balance to that. I have not heard at this point whether any other changes were made to the equity formula.

As many of you have pointed out to me, the argument that the Appalachian Development Highway System funds were directed by Congress to be spent on the Appalachian Highway, the Surface Transportation Program/Direct Attributable (STP/STP-DA) federal monies are directed by Congress to be spent by metropolitan planning areas containing urbanized areas over 200,000 population. But, like the Appalachian Development Highway System monies, the STP-DA monies flow through the State’s transportation equity formula, and are therefore spent statewide. The metropolitan planning areas containing urbanized areas over 200,00 include Asheville, Fayetteville, Greensboro, Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham, and Winston-Salem (and their MPO member cities, for example, in Raleigh this includes the Capital Area MPO with cities such as Franklinton and Creedmoor).

Democratic Leaders Reach Tentative Agreement On State Budget
http://www.digtriad.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=144333&catid=57

Officials await federal word on I-85 Yadkin bridge funds (Lexington Dispatch)

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Officials await federal word on I-85 Yadkin bridge funds (Lexington Dispatch)

AAA Carolinas recently rated the Interstate 85 bridge over the Yadkin River as the sixth worst in the state, a bump up from last year when it ranked eighth.

In 2009, efforts by Davidson and Rowan county officials and Gov. Beverly Perdue sparked the hope that soon the N.C. Department of Transportation could begin the $300 million construction project to replace the bridge. The hope was seated firmly in receiving a portion of the $1.5 billion federal stimulus grant for transportation.

Yet, as months passed without definite word if the state won the grant, officials in Raleigh started drafting a plan B.

“We know it’s the No. 1 project in the state that needs to be done,” said N.C. Rep. Hugh Holliman, D-Davidson. “As far as paying for it, we’ll just have to cross that bridge when we come to it.”

The bridge, which was built in 1955, carries between 60,000 and 70,000 vehicles daily. The N.C. Department of Transportation considers it “functionally obsolete” and “structurally deficient” by state standards.

Government officials, including Perdue, have commented on the wide-ranging negative effects on shipping and commerce if the bridge collapsed. While collapse is considered a worst-case scenario, officials remain aware the bridge is in great need of replacement.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provided $48.1 billion for transportation projects nationwide. North Carolina received $735 million for highways, $103 million for transit and shares for high-speed rail, Amtrak and other projects.

The ARRA also established surface transportation discretionary grants out of $1.5 billion to be dedicated to state projects. Perdue submitted a request for $300 million to the federal government in July, vowing to keep the state’s immediate need for a replacement bridge in the forefront of the federal government’s attention.

State officials were confident North Carolina could secure the federal funds to construct the bridge. N.C. Transportation Secretary Gene Conti was quoted by WBEV as saying, “I think we’re going to get some substantial resources from the federal government.”

In September, the Lexington City Council deeded two small pieces of land to the NCDOT parallel to Interstate 85 Business Loop just south of the Lexington Business Park in preparation for highway improvements. NCDOT began studies of the area and contract consideration, but still no word had arrived from Washington.

Dr. Max Walser, chairman of the Davidson County Board of Commissioners, has traveled to Washington several times to discuss the state’s need for a new bridge with federal officials. He said news of the grant was supposed to be announced at the beginning of the year.

“I’ve been paying attention, but it’s been very quiet,” Walser said. “My understanding is that it’s now in the hands of the Federal Transportation Commission.”

N.C. Rep. Hugh Holliman, D-Davidson, said it appears the announcement time of the bridge’s chances at federal stimulus funds will be pushed back. Holliman said he recently spoke with Jim Trogdon, chief operating officer of the NCDOT.

“He says we’re going to build that bridge, but we’re going to have to wait another two or three weeks to hear back about federal funding,” Holliman said. “Our attitude at the state level is we’re going to build that bridge.”

The state has some funding options, Holliman said, though none are as fortuitous as the boost federal stimulus money would be. State officials want to begin work this year and may be able to finance the project by breaking it down into three phases. Construction would take about three or four years.

There are some who point to the I-85 bridge as a reason to revise how NCDOT distributes money among 14 operating divisions. The Thomasville, Midway and Lexington city councils recently passed resolutions supporting a revision of the NCDOT Transportation Equity Formula.

High Point Mayor Rebecca Smothers distributed requests to area municipalities, asking them to support revision of the formula, which was established in 1989. The formula gives each division an equal share of transportation funds, but Smothers finds the Equity Formula to be somewhat unequal.

Smothers said the I-85 bridge is a project with statewide, if not national, importance. Funding bridge replacement from NCDOT transportation funds would exhaust all funds for statewide projects for years, and transportation needs have been forecast to outgrow the NCDOT budget by $64 million by 2030.

“The bridge gave us the real opportunity to point out the problems with the formula,” Smothers said. “There have been some cities to come out against the resolution because they felt it was working better for them the way it was. But if somebody’s doing better than somebody else, then it’s not really equitable.”

Heather J. Smith can be reached at 249-3981, ext. 228 or at heatherj.smith@the-dispatch.com.
By Heather J. Smith
The Dispatch

Published: Monday, January 18, 2010 at 5:00 a.m.

215 north Dawson Street • raleigh, nc 27603 • phone 919.715.7895 •  fax 919.301.1098