Transportation « North Carolina Metropolitan Mayors Coalition

Transportation Agenda

State Budget Discussions and Equity 6.28.10

Submitted 06.28.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Appalachian, Equity Formula, STP-DA, Transportation, Yadkin River Bridge

The House and Senate came to an agreement on the budget over the weekend (see article link below). While the final language has not yet been released, I am hearing that the Mobility Fund was included in the budget, but without the supplemental Powell Bill and Interstate Maintenance money. While just rumor at this point, I will send you the final language when released later today or tomorrow.

The rumored plan is to vote on the bill Tuesday and Wednesday and send to the Governor for her signature before the end of the fiscal year.

Discussions of changing the equity formula became a part of the budget negotiations. Senator Nesbitt of Buncombe County advocated that they include an exemption to the state’s transportation equity formula in the budget for the Appalachian Development Highway System federal monies. (See how the exemption would affect your highway division here.) The monies date back to 1965 when Congress designated the federal funds to be spent on the Appalachian Highway System. But, because the monies are required by state law to flow through the equity formula, they are, in effect, spent across the State. Here is an excerpt from an Asheville Citizen Times article on the issue:
“More than $30 million a year is earmarked for the highway system…but the money is going unused because of the way state and federal legislators hand it out. North Carolina law doesn’t allow spending in a region to tilt the formula for spreading road money equitably across the state. So for every dollar that highways like U.S. 74 receive in Appalachian Development Highway System funds, the far-western region has to give up 96 cents in other road funding. That’s because of how the General Assembly wrote the formula and because Congress doesn’t provide extra money for the mountain highways; it simply sets aside for them a slice of the money North Carolina would normally get to build all state highways.” (Asheville Citizen Times, 9/29/09)

The Appalachian Development Highway System monies, if exempted from the State Transportation Equity Formula, will be spent only in Graham, Cherokee, and Clay counties in highway division 14. The total new monies that will be taken from all the other highway divisions and spent in division 14 over a seven year period represent a 75% increase in federal construction highway dollars for division 14. (according to the table above provided by NCDOT)

Additionally, Rep. Hugh Holliman of Davidson County advocated that the first phase of the Yadkin River Bridge project be exempted from the formula. (Phase I is the actual bridge, while Phase II is to widen I-85 north of the bridge included as the first Mobility Fund project.)

There are rumors that the Appalachian Development Highway System funds were exempted from the equity formula in the budget bill. I am told there was much discussion around the issue, and the argument was successfully made that the urban areas had the loop money exempted, so this was in balance to that. I have not heard at this point whether any other changes were made to the equity formula.

As many of you have pointed out to me, the argument that the Appalachian Development Highway System funds were directed by Congress to be spent on the Appalachian Highway, the Surface Transportation Program/Direct Attributable (STP/STP-DA) federal monies are directed by Congress to be spent by metropolitan planning areas containing urbanized areas over 200,000 population. But, like the Appalachian Development Highway System monies, the STP-DA monies flow through the State’s transportation equity formula, and are therefore spent statewide. The metropolitan planning areas containing urbanized areas over 200,00 include Asheville, Fayetteville, Greensboro, Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham, and Winston-Salem (and their MPO member cities, for example, in Raleigh this includes the Capital Area MPO with cities such as Franklinton and Creedmoor).

Democratic Leaders Reach Tentative Agreement On State Budget
http://www.digtriad.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=144333&catid=57

NC Mobility Fund Update 6.15.10

Submitted 06.15.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Transportation

We are now at the conference committee stage of the budget process. This is when the Chambers negotiate the differences between their two budgets. As you know, the House included the Mobility Fund in their budget, but the Senate did not. Below is a list of both the Appropriations co chairs and the transportation conferees. If you have a representative on this list please call them and ask them to include the Mobility Fund in the final budget and two add two of the Governor’s provisions to the Fund – supplemental Powell Bill monies and dedicated Interstate Maintenance funds.

We believe that dedicating 6.5 percent of the Mobility Fund to new additional Powell Bill revenues is critical to its overall support and success. Including the Powell Bill supplement ensures that every community across North Carolina receives some of these new transportation dollars.

We are also asking the conferees to dedicate $30 million dollars of the Mobility Fund to interstate maintenance. According to a June 2nd article in Stateline, “Letting a road deteriorate from excellent condition to fair condition makes it three times as costly to fix.” We need to be smart about investing in our roads at a time when bids are at historical lows. Additionally, having Mobility Funds spent on our interstates will free up equity fund dollars traditionally spent on interstate maintenance to be spent elsewhere in a highway division.

Transportation Conferees:
Senate: Goss, Graham, Jenkins, Shaw, Stein
House: Cole, Martin, Coates, Gill, Heagarty, May, Parfitt, Williams, Dockham

Appropriations Chairs:
Senior Chairman Rep. Michaux
Chairman Rep. Adams
Chairman Rep. M. Alexander
Chairman Rep. Crawford
Chairman Rep. Haire
Chairman Rep. Jeffus
Chairman Rep. Tolson
Chairman Rep. Yongue
Co-Chairman Sen. Charles W. Albertson
Co-Chairman Sen. Linda Garrou
Co-Chairman Sen. A. B Swindell
Co-Chairman Sen. Charlie S. Dannelly

Mobility Fund Comparison-Governor/Senate/House

Submitted 06.07.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Transportation

As we enter the final state budget negotiations I have created a chart to outline the different provisions of the Mobility Fund as proposed by the Governor, the Senate, and the House. I have also done a letter you can send to your delegation encouraging them to include the Powell Bill Supplement, dedicated Interstate Maintenance funds, and an end to the transfer from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund. Lastly, if your city council and/or you MPO has not passed a resolution in support of the Mobility Fund we have one of those as well.

NC Board of Transportation Meeting 6.3.10 (Summary by Jim Humphrey, CDOT)

Submitted 06.07.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Board of Transportation, I-95, Mobility Fund, NCDOT, TIPAG, Transportation, Turnpike Authority

NC Board of Transportation Meeting 6.3.10 (Summary by Jim Humphrey, CDOT)

Secretary’s Remarks- Jim Trogden spoke of Mobility Funds, response to a Amtrak Train derailment in Mebane, expansion of mid-day train service between Raleigh and Charlotte, award of the contract for I-485 and the public event in Charlotte, more work to integrate NCTA into NCDOT (including plans to physically move them to NCDOT offices) and several other topics.

Legislative Update- Johanna Reese discussed the status of the Mobility Fund (same info which Julie White sent). All of NCDOT’s agency bills seem to be progressing nicely. Nina indicated she had heard some concern regarding a bill that would regulate bicycling on highways. She indicated the controversial part of the bill relates to a requirement that bicyclist move to single file “quickly” when a car approaches. It also does not allow bicyclist to ride more than 2 abreast. The bill number was not provided.

Transportation Intergovernmental Advisory Group- Jim Westmoreland provided an update regarding work which I think you are familiar with. Several subgroups have been formed to look at communication and education with local officials, future transportation funding strategy (reauthorization), reduce land use and transportation impacts (schools), census impact on MPO/RPO boundaries and coordination of TIGER II grants.

Art and Aesthetics on State Projects- Don Lee indicated a new policy was being developed. Art is typically free standing or on a structure. A DOT committee has been formed to develop the guidelines. There will likely be a submittal package required and a sponsor in local government or a local entity for any art structure. This will include a maintenance agreement. The draft guidelines will be published in June or July and distributed to an external advisory committee which will likely include local government officials.

Noise Barrier Aesthetics Update- Greg Smith provided an update. It appears that DOT is headed toward developing 3 or 4 types of wall finishes and 3 or 4 colors that can be selected during public involvement. They do plan to treat both sides of walls (which residents and business on the outside of the wall will appreciate) and plan to use more concrete columns/pillars and horizontal coping. Some on the board expressed concern over added cost compared to current practice. Greg assured them that the added cost was relatively small (about 5-10%). They had a good discussion regarding how noise walls affect the image of cities and the topic of gateways. Some on the board said if a city/town wanted something more than the standard wall, they would have to pay the cost. I did have a private discussion with Greg after the presentation and reinforced the need for flexibility particularly on gateway projects. I also suggested an advisory committee including local government be asked to review whatever is ultimately proposed. Another idea is to run the proposal thru the Complete Streets Committee. Greg seemed to appreciate my comments and I feel he will run whatever is proposed thru local folks at some time.

Ecosystem Enhancement Program- Bill Gilmore presented information regarding an interim budget. 84% of funds are geared toward restoration of wetlands..

I-95 Planning and Funding Report- Roberto Gonzales discussed the history and current status. The key aspect is work regarding potential tolling. They have found if tolling were implemented only at state borders, revenues would equal only 10% ($25m) of revenues that would be collected if the road were tolled thru-out the state ($250m). If tolls were implemented only at the borders, they could build about 1 mile of improvements per year. They are looking at tolling options that include all lanes and only new lanes. Another interesting aspect of the study is that they are working with FHWA to answer the question of how far from the toll road itself might money from tolls be spent to mitigate impacts of traffic that will divert from the interstate. The NCDOT continues to work with neighboring states, hold public input and expects to issue further results of their study later this year/early next year.

Work Program including STIP- Jim Trogden asked that this subject be delayed until next meeting. He said they had not been able to discuss loop schedules with affected areas.

Cash Model- Mark Foster presented info on a cash model which NCDOT utilizes to manage/optimize funds. Interestingly, NCDOT is the only state agency allowed to cash flow their business (SB 1005).

Data Integration Model- Victor Barbour provided information on an internal project begun in 2008 and finished in 2010 to integrate data previously contained in separate divisions. Although the info is used in many ways, one use is to allow managers (primarily) and employees to monitor their success in meeting performance targets. He showed a map of the state with counties shown in different colors indicating those above and below goals for crash rates. He also indicated how the same data may be obtained in graphical and tabular forms. You may wish to have your performance monitoring and IT folks call Victor to arrange a demonstration.

Low Impact Bridges- Lacy Love presented info on the NCDOT’s work to accelerate replacement/repair of bridges. They have done a lot of work with partner agencies to develop check lists for environmental screening, developed standard bridge plans and make sure scope creep does not occur to enable them to replace bridges in as little as 1 year. Bridge replacements that qualify are very simple and minimize damage to the environment (for instance, no detour bridge on site).

Next Meeting in Kinston- The board decided to have their next meeting in Kinston. They feel having the meeting in eastern NC will permit them to see important projects in that part of the state and talk to local officials. My impression is that most meetings will continue to be in Raleigh…and that they will occasionally travel east and west.

I hope this info is beneficial. If you have questions feel free to email me or call me at 704-351-5850.

Jim Humphrey

SB1136: Regulate Towing in Cities Alert

Submitted 06.04.10 | Comments (1)

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Rucho, towing, Transportation

SB1136: AN ACT TO STRENGTHEN THE REGULATION OF THE TOWING OF VEHICLES FROM PRIVATE LOTS IN CERTAIN COUNTIES AND CITIES, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

The City of Charlotte has contacted Sen. Rucho, the bill sponsor, with concerns about this bill. See text of letter below. And suggested addition to the bill.

Senator Rucho,

Thank you for the opportunity to discuss SB 1136 earlier this week. As we discussed the City is concerned that the language in section (a2) of SB 1136 would prohibit the City from setting tow rates. The City has set these rates since 2003 in response to incidents where vehicle owners were charged exorbitant rates to get their vehicles back.

Attached you will find language suggested by the Police Department for the City to maintain the privilege to set the two rates. The language also clarifies that provisions of the City ordinance that may in the future be in conflict with the statute can be maintained and modified on a periodic basis.

I will stop by your office on Tuesday to discuss further. If in the meantime, you have any questions please call me at my office at 704.336.2009 or on my cell phone at 704.408.7393.

Thank you and have a good weekend.

Dana Fenton

(d) This section is not intended to preempt the ability of a city or county mentioned above to regulate by ordinance for the removal of unauthorized vehicles from private lots or for the establishment of a reasonable towing fee for services rendered.

Ted Voorhees says:

June 4, 2010 at 3:22 pm

The City of Durham would STRONGLY oppose State legislation that prevents the City from protecting consumers from predatory towing practices regarding tows from private property.

Ted Voorhees, Deputy City Manager

Mobility Fund Update 5.3.2010

Submitted 06.03.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, intermodal, Loops, Mobility Fund, Transportation

The House Budget Bill does include the Mobility Fund. Below is a summary of what is in the Mobility Fund, and what is not.

Funds going into the Mobility Fund:
$39 million in GAP funds that are likely to be unspent FY 2009-10
$31 million from Highway Trust Fund transfer to the General Fund in FY2011-12
$45 million from Highway Trust Fund transfer to the General Fund in FY2012-13
$45 million from Highway Trust Fund transfer to the General Fund in FY2013-14 (and for future years)

This leaves $25.5 million to be transferred from the HTF to the GF for future years and $18 million transferred from the Highway Fund to the General Fund for future years. (It is the Governor and NCDOT’s desire to have the remaining funds currently transferred from the HTF and HF to the GF deposited into the Mobility Fund.)

The YRB project will consume all the Mobility Fund dollars until mid FY2013-14. The bill has a stakeholder process to develop the project prioritization process for future Fund projects. The bill also gives preferential consideration to projects qualified to receive state grants from the Congestion Relief and Intermodal Transportation Fund.

The Governor’s provision to allocate 6.5% of the Mobility Fund each year to Powell Bill is not in the House bill. Neither is the dedicated $30 million each year for Interstate Maintenance.

The budget bill next goes to conference committee where the House and Senate negotiate a final compromise bill. The Mobility Fund was not in the Senate Budget, so the issue is in contention and may or may not be in the final compromise budget bill. The Governor, NCDOT, the League, and the Metro Mayors are also working to try to get the Powell Bill and Interstate Maintenance provisions into the budget bill during the conference process.

Mobility Fund Update 6.2.2010

Submitted 06.02.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Transportation

The House Appropriations Committee debated and voted on the budget today. Next stop, the floor of the House tomorrow morning at 10 AM for debate and first vote. They will vote a second time after midnight. (Each bill needs two floor votes and the budget bill requires those votes to be on two separate days, which is why they will vote again after midnight.)

The Mobility Fund was included in the House budget with enough money to do the I 85 widening at the Yadkin River Bridge. While the leadership was not amenable to including the expansion of Powell Bill funds nor the dedicated money for Interstate maintenance, we were able to add the stakeholder process back in.

If the Mobility Fund remains in the budget after the full House votes tomorrow it will be eligible for debate in the conference committee where the House and Senate resolve their differences.

You can see the amendments to SB897 (the House version of the budget not reflecting amendments made in Appropriations today) by clicking here.

Mobility Fund Update 6.1.10

Submitted 06.01.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Perdue, Transportation

The House has included a Mobility Fund in their budget at this time. The budget bill (both the money report and the bill) is posted on line at http://www.ncleg.net/sessions/2009/budget/2010/S897-CSLRxf-40.pdf and http://www.ncleg.net/sessions/2009/budget/2010/budgetreport06-01-10.pdf. You can search on the term “Mobility” to find the language.

The House has written a new version of the Fund and it is substantially different from the Governor’s version.

1. The Governor’s proposal included new additional Powell Bill funds for cities; the House version does not.
2. The Governor’s proposal included new dedicated funds for Interstate maintenance; the House version does not.
3. The Governor’s proposal included a stakeholder process for designing the criteria for project selection; the House version does not.
4. The Governor’s proposal (after funding the Yakin River Bridge) included funds for future projects(DMV fee increases and a phase out of the transfers from the Highway Fund and Highway Trust Fund); the House version does not.

What does this mean and where are we?

The good news is that the House is creating a Mobility Fund. The bad news- its sole funded purpose at this time is the Yadkin River Bridge. If all goes as scheduled, the House Finance Committee will be voting on the bill at 4pm today, the House Appropriations Committee will be voting on the bill at 9 am tomorrow, and then to the House floor for votes later this week.

Please keep talking to your legislators about the importance of the Fund and the need to include it in the Budget bill. Ask them to include the Governor’s stakeholder process in the bill so your community can have a voice in the prioritization process.

There were news articles and editorials over the weekend in support of the fund you can read on the Metro Mayors Daily Clips page.

Update on NC Mobility Fund 5.26.10

Submitted 05.26.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Perdue, Transportation

Update on NC Mobility Fund 5.26.10

The Governor has been working hard on the Mobility Fund. She kicked off the week Monday by hosting a press conference with mayors to encourage the House to include the Fund in their budget. She had a sit down with key House members yesterday and they were able to reach agreement. Word is spreading that the Mobility Fund will be included in the House budget. It will receive $22 million of the funds currently transferred from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund, GAP funds the NCDOT will not spend this year, and allow NC DOT to start their prioritization process. There will not be any of the proposed DMV fee increases. The first project will be the Yadkin River Bridge. I am hearing there will not be any additional funds or projects until NC DOT has finished their prioritization process and receives the blessing of the General Assembly.

Thank you for your resolutions in support of the Fund, your comments to the House budget website, and your calls to delegation members. Keep them coming!!! As soon as there is ink on a page to create the Fund I will alert you. In the meantime, please call your House delegation and thank them for recognizing the importance of creating the Mobility Fund this year. We want to keep talking to the members about the importance of the Fund to ensure it does not hit any snags between now and the final vote in the House.

After the House vote next week we are only half way there. After the House passes their version of the budget the work of the conference committee begins. The conference committee is charged with ironing out differences between the House and Senate budgets. Since the Senate did not include the Fund in their version of the budget we will have to encourage the Senate to agree with the House on this provision.

Stay tuned for updates.

Mobility Fund Update 5.24.10

Submitted 05.25.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Transportation

While the Governor and mayors held a press conference in support of the NC Mobility Fund just hours before, the House leadership just announced they do not plan include the Fund in their budget.

We are asking that you register your support for the NC Mobility Fund by sending your comments to the NC House via the website they have created to hear from you. Click here to complete the form and note that you support the House including the NC Mobility Fund in their budget.

We need to encourage as many people as possible to register their support of the Fund through the House’s website. Please ask all your council members, staff, family, neighbors, and friends to go to the website and ask the House to include the Mobility Fund in the budget.

Here are the talking points:

Need: North Carolina needs additional transportation resources that focus on mobility projects of statewide significance.

Solution: The Mobility Fund needs to be created this year, even if only with limited funding. Let’s get the Fund started.

Project Selection: The first project should be the Yadkin River Bridge. While the bridge is being built NCDOT can lead a prioritization process much like they have done over the last year for highway projects. We have confidence in NCDOT to partner with a wide range of stakeholders to ensure a data driven process that will target the Mobility Fund resources at projects of statewide significance that affect mobility.

Risk: Don’t just fix the Yadkin River Bridge without creating the Mobility Fund. Create the Fund and designate the Bridge as the first project.

The website is only accepting comments through tomorrow, so register your thoughts quickly.

House needs to hear from you in support of the Mobility Fund

Submitted 05.24.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Transportation

While the Governor and mayors held a press conference in support of the NC Mobility Fund just hours before, the House leadership just announced they do not plan include the Fund in their budget.

Here are the talking points:

Need: North Carolina needs additional transportation resources that focus on mobility projects of statewide significance.

Solution: The Mobility Fund needs to be created this year, even if only with limited funding. Let’s get the Fund started.

Risk: Don’t just fix the Yadkin River Bridge without creating the Mobility Fund. Create the Fund and designate the Bridge as the first project.

The website is only accepting comments through tomorrow, so register your thoughts quickly.

Mobility Fund Update 5.21.2010

Submitted 05.20.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Mobility Fund, Transportation

The Senate did not include the Governor’s proposed Mobility Fund in their budget. It is the Governor and NCDOT’s hope that the House will include it in their budget.

The Governor is holding a press conference on Monday, May 24th and has asked the League and the Metro Mayors to turn their folks out in support. We are asking all local elected officials to come Monday to Exit 290 off I-40 (Exit for Hwy 54, from Eastbound I-40) by 2:15 PM and show your support for the Mobility Fund.

As a refresher, the Governor proposed an NC Mobility Fund in her 2011 Budget which generates $300 million to fund projects of statewide significance. The sources of revenue include DMV related fee increases and the continued phasing out of the transfers from the Highway Fund and Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund. The Governor believes that critical congestion issues impact the entire state, our economy and our ability to maintain and attract jobs. All modes of transportation including highway, rail, aviation, ports, ferry, transit, bike and pedestrian would be eligible for funding. The first project to receive funding would be the Yadkin River Bridge during which time NCDOT would develop a prioritization process for future projects in collaboration with local governments, stakeholders, and the general public. The fund includes $30 million per year in dedicated interstate maintenance funds and $20 million per year for additional municipal Powell Bill funding.

The Metro Mayors have sent a letter to the General Assembly supporting the Fund. The League Board has voted in support of the concept.

What can you do to ensure this very important expansion of transportation funding and Powell Bill funding is enacted?

Call your House delegation members right away. Things are moving very fast in the House. Decisions on this fund will likely be made by Monday night if not sooner. Here are your talking points:

Need: North Carolina needs additional transportation resources that focus on mobility projects of statewide significance.

Solution: The Mobility Fund needs to be created this year, even if only with limited funding. Let’s get the Fund started.

Risk: Don’t just fix the Yadkin River Bridge without creating the Mobility Fund. Create the Fund and designate the Bridge as the first project.

Show members of the General Assembly that cities have confidence in NCDOT to build a prioritization process that will ensure the funds are spent on mobility projects of statewide significance. If you need to know more about the process NCDOT did over the last year call your Division Engineer and ask them more about it. Ask them about the fund.

The Governor has asked for our help in lobbying for the Mobility Fund. Please let me know if you reach out to your House delegation and what you hear back.

Click here for more on the Mobility Fund, talking points, the bill, etc.

2010 Transportation Budget

Submitted 05.14.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Mobility Fund, Transportation

April 20

The Governor released her proposed adjustments to the state’s 2010-2011 budget on April 20. Joint House and Senate Appropriations met on April 21 to hear the details from her staff. Sen. Garrou, co-chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, outlined the Senate’s timetable for the budget process. Here is a link to more information about the Mobility Fund.

Appropriations sub-committees have already begun meeting and will continue to meet through the opening of session on May 12th. The Senate plans to vote on the budget bill on May 20. It will then go to the House. The House has not announced a specific timetable, but has said they plan to vote on the budget bill around the middle of June. The budget bill will then to go a conference committee made up of both House and Senate members who will negotiate a final budget with the goal of having it in place by July 1.

May 14

The Senate Transportation Committee released their draft budget today for discussion. They plan to meet early next week to vote.

Jim Humphrey’s (CDOT) notes from the May 5-6 BOT meeting.

Submitted 05.07.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Board of Transportation, Transportation

Jim Humphrey’s (CDOT) notes from the May 5-6 BOT meeting.

One change for the meeting….an ethics statement is read and all members are required to sign a sheet of paper indicating they will abide by the ethics policy.

Secretary’s Comments-Conti passed out a rail program pamphlet that will be produced periodically. Mentioned opening of I-40, award of Phase I of Yadkin River bridge (HDR, a Charlotte firm is member of team), Turnpike Authority awarded contract for electronic toll collection (upon question was stated NCTA still considering use of cash toll stations at request of companies who may finance and operate), Paul Worley of Rail Division won national award….

The Built Environment-2 gentlemen spoke on how infrastructure, particularly sidewalks and bike facilities, can help with physical well being. Lots of good statistics and info on how NC is doing (low…not well). Interesting, the Complete Streets Policy which the BOT approved in July 2009 was a highlight as great improvement initiative.

Legislative Agenda-Johanna Reese spoke of the Mobility Fund in the Governor’s budget as well as about the 3 bills you already have heard about. Regarding the Mobility Fund, Mark Foster indicated the funds may be used for some non DOT traditional items….I think he meant some web and information technology related investments to assist logistics or ED (he mentioned in other meetings I attended that DOT is developing a list of the types of things these funds may be used on, so this should help clarify). Hearing a paragraph has been added to legislation that ensures an inclusive process, with cities and MPOs among others, to develop criteria for funding. Regarding the three bills, Johanna specifically stated that one bill would remove language so that the NCDOT could consider local funding assistance in project funding decisions.

Logistics Task Force-Roberto Canales presented info on the history and work program. A report was developed previously that indicated the types of things NC should do to improve logistics/freight movement. Roberto described that report as a plan calling for more planning. The task force has the general job of “creating new jobs and recruiting industry thro the movement of goods and information” (his description) and is undertaking the planning mentioned previously.

Initiatives for Historically Under Utilized Businesses-Several NCDOT speakers presented info on their efforts to attract and utilize minority and other business.

Financial Update-Mark Foster indicated they are seeing some positive turnaround in revenues. He described the Governor’s transportation budget recommendations which included $52m more for the Highway Fund (primary use was putting back in Driver Education dollars removed previously) and $80m+ in Highway Trust Fund (Mobility Fund). Mark also spoke of a new financial system for large MPOs which helps them better manage federal dollars designated for their projects (CMAQ and STP primarily). My impression is that the system is already in use by MPOs. It would seem to help folks keep track of projects, including phased projects…understand how much money is unspent….and when certain money most be spent. Apparently some problems existed during the recent rescission that demonstrated MPOs need such a system.

Eco Enhancement Program-Bill Gilmore outlined the programs which performs wetland and stream restoration “off site” that may be called for as part of NCDOT projects. He also went over the proposed budget which the board will be asked to approve next month.

Cash Management Model Demo-Postponed until next month.

DMV Revenue Shortfall-The head of DMV spoke of decreases in revenues caused by the slow economy and concern over the increase in expired licenses….which is not only a financial concern to NCDOT, but also a concern that these vehicles may lack liability insurance. He did not present any solution.

Turnpike Authority-David Joyner presented a status report regarding all projects. He called the Monroe Connector the “most viable toll project in the state”. They are pursuing federal TIFIA funding but have produced financial models with and without these dollars. He stated construction would start in early 2011 and it would be open to traffic in 2014/2015. David stated challenges to the NCTA include rising interest rates, recessionary impact on growth and revenue forecast, securing funding in lieu of federal TIFIA loans and securing gap funds for unfunded designated toll projects.

Jim Humphrey

Logistics Taskforce

Submitted 05.04.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Logistics Task Force, Transportation

Perdue wants to get state moving (News and Observer)

Gov. Bev Perdue’s topic Tuesday was like the 1987 movie: “Planes, Trains and Automobiles” — or how to move people and goods around more efficiently.

So the governor showed up at a football field-size warehouse near Raleigh-Durham Airport, to sign an executive order creating The Governor’s Logistics Task Force, Rob Christensen reports.

The task force is a 27-member group, headed by Lt. Gov. Walter Dalton that will look at ways to make the highways, airports, sea ports and rail facilities work together more efficiently.

The governor didn’t outline how she planned to do this since there is little extra money in the state coffers for new spending. But both Perdue and Dalton said that despite North Carolina’s reputation for being a business-friendly state, it must continually look for ways to create more jobs and make the state more attractive for industry.

Perdue said most businesses that she recruits want to know about airports and highways.

The announcement was made at the Raleigh headquarters of Longistics, a shipping and warehousing company where Perdue watched Slim Jims being packaged.

Submitted by bniolet on 2009-12-08 16:32

2/5/2010 Meeting Minutes

3/16/2010 Meeting Minutes

Meeting Schedule

NCDOT 2010 Legislative Agenda – Legislation and Mobility Fund

Submitted 04.30.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Mobility Fund, NCDOT, Transportation

The NC Department of Transportation unveiled their legislative agenda for the 2010 Short Session which includes a couple of items of interest to cities. I have posted all three draft bill below by the draft title, but pay special attention to DOT Powers and Duties Changes. So far I am hearing positive feedback from transportation folks, but drop me a line and share your perspective with me.

Motor Vehicles Law Changes

DOT Powers and Duties Changes

Turnpike Authority Toll Enforcement Changes

Mobility Fund

NC Go letter in support of Mobility Fund

Table comparing other state’s fees to proposed increases to support Mobility Fund

Resolution in support of Mobility Fund

Frequently Asked Questions about the Mobility Fund

Governor’s Mobility Fund Bill

NCDOT Talking Points on Mobility Fund

Governor Proposes NC Mobility Fund

Submitted 04.20.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: budget, Perdue, Transportation

Governor Perdue announced the creation of the NC Mobility Fund today as a part of her 2010-11 budget adjustments. The Fund will not be subject to the Equity Formula. While the details are not yet known for how the money will be distributed the budget notes that it will focus on critical congestion bottlenecks, improving logistics capabilities, and economic development goals. The monies used to create the fund include a reduction in the transfer from the Highway Trust Fund and an increase in various motor vehicle related fees. The first project to be funded is the Yadkin River Bridge.

NCDOT COO Jim Trogdon informs me that he is looking forward to working with the Metro Mayors and the League in developing the selection criteria for the Fund.

It is important to note that this is only the Governor’s Proposed Budget. It is now up to the legislature to determine if they want to include the NC Mobility Fund and the corresponding fee increases in the budget they pass into law. I will be attending the legislative meetings tomorrow to hear their discussions on the Governor’s Proposed Budget and keep you updated.

Governor’s Proposed 2010-11 Transportation Budget

(Excerpt from Budget)
This budget invests $22 million in a new, innovative North Carolina Mobility Fund that will be used to address critical congestion bottlenecks and to improve our logistics capabilities. The Fund would not impact the current equity formula and would be linked to statewide economic goals. The first scheduled project is the completion of the I-85 north section of the Yadkin River Bridge. Future funds will be available for all state transportation modes including roads, aviation, ports, transit and rail.

North Carolina Mobility Fund
The North Carolina Mobility Fund is created within the Highway Trust Fund. It is funded by re-ducing the transfer from the Highway Trust fund to the General Fund and increasing certain motor vehicle related fees. The purpose of the Fund is to create a dedicated source of revenue that can be used for projects that have statewide significance and are linked to statewide economic goals. The revenue available to the North Carolina Mobility Fund in fiscal year 2010-11 is $72.6 million. Table 11 shows the various fee schedules used to fund the North Carolina Mobility Fund for fiscal year 2010-11.

Drivers License Fees- Copies of Drivers License Records, Increase the fee 25%
Staggered Registrations- Automobiles and Light Truck Registrations. Increase fees 25%
International Registration Plan (IRP)- Trucks Used in Interstate Commerce, Increase various Interstate Motor Carrier Fees
Registration Fees – Miscellaneous Registration Fees under the Highway Trust Funds, Increase fees 33%

Transportation
Major Recommendations
Governor Perdue is extremely committed to investing funds in infrastructure projects to fa¬cilitate economic growth. Restoring and main¬taining the state’s transportation infrastructure and promoting public transit initiatives are key components.

The Governor’s budget recommendations include funds to establish the NC Mobility Fund. The fund will provide a dedicated source of transportation revenues for projects of statewide significance that are linked to statewide eco¬nomic goals. The funds will be available for all transportation modes, including aviation, ports, transit and rail. Critical congestion bottlenecks will be addressed and North Carolina’s logistics capabilities will be improved. The NC Mobility Fund will not be included in the equity for¬mula, thus relieving the load placed on regional transportation plans when they have to bear the burden of large statewide projects.

Total funding of $3.8 billion is recommended in support of North Carolina’s Transportation Program for fiscal year 2010-11. Over 75% of the funding is recommended for construction, maintenance, and public transportation activities throughout the state.

Figures 7 and 8 show the distribution of funding sources and appropriations for North Carolina‘s Transportation Program for fiscal year 2010-11.

Major Transportation Program Recom¬mendations
Provide $94.6 million to establish the NC Mo¬bility Fund for multi-modal transportation projects of statewide significance that are linked to statewide economic goals.

Return $22 million in funding to the trans¬portation program by further reducing the annual transfer from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund to be used for the NC Mobility Fund.

Provide $4.8 million in additional funds for ferry operations to ensure the current service levels are maintained.

Provide $4.3 million in rail funding for construction of the Pembroke Northeast Bypass project.

Completion of this project will facilitate improved multi-modal access to southeast North Carolina, linking the states military bases with state ports.

Approve $2 million for short-line railroad rehabilitation projects.

Provide $2 million for projects aimed at mak¬ing government operations more effective and efficient through investment in infor¬mation technology projects that streamline program operations.

Dedicate $1.6 billion, or 44% of total program resources, for the construction program.

Provide $934 million (24%) of total program resources for highway maintenance activities throughout the state.

Appropriation Items — Recommended Adjustments

Reductions 2010-11

Mandated Adjustments
1. Statutory Adjustment to Aid to Municipalities Allocation
In accordance with G.S. 136-41.1, an adjustment based on the estimated gallons of motor fuel sold is necessary to update the allocation for state aid to municipalities (Powell Bill) based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Fund for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation ($785,319)

2. Statutory Adjustment to Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund (LUST)
In accordance with G.S. 105-119(a) and (b), an adjustment is required to the appropriation for the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund to update the allocation based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Fund for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation ($40,000)

Maintenance

1. Maintenance Funds
It is recommended that Highway Fund appropriations for maintenance of the state’s highway infrastructure be reduced to align overall requirements for the Highway Fund with projected revenues for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation ($3,698,277)

Transfers to Other State Agencies
1. Department of Public Instruction – Drivers Education A reduction in the funding for the Driver Education Program is recommended for fiscal year 2010-11 based on actual expenditures and historical reversion patterns for the program. Appropriation – Nonrecurring ($1,300,000)

Expansion 2010-11

Mandated Adjustments

1. Statutory Adjustment to Secondary Roads Construction Allocation In accordance with G.S. 136-44.2A, an adjustment based on the estimated gallons of motor fuel sold is necessary to update the allocation for secondary roads construction based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Fund for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation $3,840,718

Ferry Division
1. Maintain Current Level of Services Additional operating funds are recommended for the Ferry Division to maintain their current level of services for fiscal year 2010-11. Operating funds were reduced for the 2009-11 biennium to balance the overall requirements for the Highway Fund with projected revenues. Appropriation $4,805,311

Rail Division
1. Grants to Short Line Railroads Provide funds to the Rail Division for grants to short line railroad companies to fund rehabilitation projects that strengthen North Carolina’s short line rail infrastructure. Appropriation $2,000,000
2. Pembroke Northeast Bypass Connector Provide funds to the Rail Division for construction of the Pembroke Northeast Bypass project. Preliminary engineering, environmental documentation and right of way acquisition have been previously authorized and are underway for this project. The connector will provide improved multi-modal access to southeast North Carolina, linking the states military bases with State Ports. Appropriation – Nonrecurring $4,325,000

Division of Motor Vehicles
1. Medical Certification Compliance Funds are recommended to allow the Division of Motor Vehicles to become compliant with new federal legislation that requires medical certification as part of the Commercial Driver License (CDL) process. All medical certificates for CDL applicants have to be reviewed to ensure they meet the medical requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration prior to issuance of a CDL. Appropriation $192,351 Appropriation – Nonrecurring $7,550 Number of Positions 5.000
2. Law Enforcement Vehicle Expenses Funds are recommended for motor fleet fees associated with specialized law enforcement vehicles assigned to the License and Theft Bureau within the Division of Motor Vehicles. The funds were reduced during the 2009-11 budget and are not sufficient to pay for currently assigned vehicles. Appropriation – Nonrecurring $344,722

Administration
1. IT – Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard Compliance Funding is recommended for an information technology project that will allow the department to upgrade their computer applications and supporting infrastructure that process payment cards to become compliant with new standards imposed by Master Card. Funding is requested for required hardware, software, and assessment services to maintain PCI compliance. Appropriation $135,000 Appropriation – Nonrecurring $350,000

2. IT – Enterprise IP Telephone System Funds are recommended to replace the existing Interactive Voice Response (IVR) hardware and applications and annual operating funds required for IT expenses with an upgraded telephone solution for the Division of Motor Vehicles. The current IVR system is no longer supported and is critical to the Division’s ability to respond effectively to citizens’ needs and deliver a high level of customer service via its call center. The Division’s current telephone technology is outdated and ineffective, and the infrastructure cannot be updated to meet its future needs. Appropriation $544,289 Appropriation – Nonrecurring $515,000

Agency Reserves
1. State Employees Payback It is recommended that all employees paid from the highway fund receive a 0.5% one-time payback for the salary reduction taken to balance the budget in FY 2008-09. Appropriation – Nonrecurring $2,701,641
2. Retirement System Contribution It is recommended that the State’s contribution to the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System be increased in FY 2010-11. The increase represents the funds required for state employees that are paid from highway fund appropriations. Appropriation $930,050

Transfers to Other State Agencies
1. CC&PS-Provide Matching Funds to Continue VIPER Interoperable Communications Network Development Funds are recommended to be transferred to Crime Control and Public Safety to provide matching funds for the Public Safety Interoperability Communications (PSIC) grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce received by the Highway Patrol. The PSIC grant will be used to assist in the further development of the VIPER interoperable communications network. Appropriation $4,700,000
2. Department of Public Instruction – Drivers Education Funds are recommended to restore the recurring appropriation for the Driver Education Program based on findings of a continuation review of the program as directed by the 2009 Session of the General Assembly. Appropriation $33,321,964

Appropriation Items — Recommended Adjustments
Reductions 2010-11

1. Reduce Transfer to General Fund
It is recommended that the transfer from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund authorized by G.S. 105-187.9 be reduced by an additional $22 million for FY 2010-11. This reinforces the Governor’s pledge to eliminate this transfer by 2012. Appropriation ($22,000,000)
2. Statutory Adjustment to Secondary Roads Construction Allocation
An adjustment consistent with statutory formulas is recommended to the appropriation for secondary roads construction. The adjustment is required to update the allocation based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Trust Fund for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation ($170,627)

Expansion 2010-11
1. Establish North Carolina Mobility Fund Notwithstanding G.S. 136-176(b), the recommended funds made available by further reducing the transfer from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund ($22 million) and other dedicated revenue sources from motor vehicle fees ($72.6 million) shall be used for the NC Mobility Fund. The funds will be available for all transportation modes and can only be utilized for the purposes outlined in an associated special provision that creates the fund. The request will facilitate establishment of a dedicated source of funding that can be used for projects that have statewide significance and are linked to statewide economic goals. Appropriation $94,583,983
2. Statutory Adjustment to Intrastate System Allocation An adjustment consistent with statutory formulas is recommended to the appropriation for the intrastate system. The adjustment is required to update the allocation based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Trust Fund for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation $4,995,162
3. Statutory Adjustment to Urban Loops Construction Allocation An adjustment consistent with statutory formulas is recommended to the appropriation for urban loops construction. The adjustment is required to update the allocation based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Trust Fund for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation $2,019,836
4. Statutory Adjustment to Aid to Municipalities Allocation An adjustment consistent with statutory formulas is recommended to the appropriations for state aid to municipalities (Powell Bill). The adjustment is required to update the allocation based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Trust Fund for fiscal year 2010. Appropriation $524,109
5. Statutory Adjustment to Program Administration Allocation An adjustment consistent with statutory formulas is recommended to the appropriation for administration. The adjustment is required to update the allocation based on revised revenue estimates for the Highway Trust Fund for fiscal year 2010-11. Appropriation $371,520

Joint Trans. Oversight Comm. 4.6.10

Submitted 04.07.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Equity Formula, General Assembly, Transportation

Agenda

Presentations and Handouts Click Here (For all)

High Point Mayor Rebecca Smothers Speech

Regional Transportation Alliance Presentation on Allocation Formula Boundries

CAMPO and DCHC MPO Joint Presentation

North Carolina’s Transportation Equity Formula

Submitted 01.22.10 | Comments (1)

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Equity Formula, Transportation

Click here to read the Metro Mayors White Paper on the State’s Transportation Equity Formula

Click here to see the video on the State’s Transportation Equity Formula

Below are a list of the cities and MPOs thus far that have pass a resolution in support of evaluating and revising the State’s Transportation Equity Formula.

Gaston Urban Area MPO

Winston Salem Urban Area MPO

Cabarrus-Rowan MPO

Paul Black says:

January 26, 2010 at 3:02 pm

Any resolutions against? I understand Jacksonville and many points east prefer the status quo.

NCBOT Jan. 6th, 2010 Summary

Submitted 01.08.10 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Board of Transportation, Transportation

By Jim Humphrey, City of Charlotte

All Board positions have been appointed. A member from the Jacksonville area is the lone member awaiting confirmation.

The Planning Committee received a presentation from NCDOT media/communications staff relative to plans to partner with DENR to conduct a media campaign regarding ways to reduce highway/greenhouse emissions. Phase One will be conducted at no/low cost (posters at State and public offices, work with AAA, publicize at events such as NASCAR, etc.). A second phase could include TV/radio/web. Phase One is expected to commence in conjunction with a Climate Conference the first week of March. The slide show is probably on the NCDOT website.

Johanna Reese provided a legislative update to the Safety and Emerging Issues Committee. Most efforts are associated with work with the Legislature’s Joint Transportation Oversight Committee to develop an agenda for 2010. The next meeting of the JTOC is January 19 and will include the Annual Turnpike Authority Report and a presentation on rapid train technology.

Cities, towns and counties now have authority to adopt ordinances regulating golf carts on public roads. NCDOT has developed a draft ordinance they hope will be used as a model statewide thereby making ordinances similar across the state. They plan to ask the NCLM and NCLCC to distribute to their members for comment within the next week. Kevin Lacy is the lead state staff person.

The Rail Committee received a power point presentation regarding the NCDOT railcar refurbishment and rebuild program. The NCDOT typically buys cars no longer needed by larger systems then refurbishes and upgrades them at much lower cost than purchase of new equipment.

The NCDOT expects to hear from the feds this month regarding their application for recovery act funds for High Speed Rail and the 85/Yadkin River bridge.

The Complete Streets Committee will short list firms interested in assisting late this month.

Dan Thomas presented an overview of the process for developing a Comprehensive Transportation Plan to the Multimodal Committee. He highlighted 5 steps and emphasized how multimodal and land use considerations are incorporated.

The Programming and Finance Committee received a report by Gene Conti indicating the NCDOT Performance Report for 2009 had been prepared and was being distributed. Other staff discussed recent and new Ethics Orders issued by the Governor.

Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee Nov. 17th, 2009

Submitted 11.19.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Equity Formula, General Assembly, NCDOT, Revenue

Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee Nov. 17th, 2009

Highlights

NCDOT presented on North Carolina’s population growth, shrinking transportation revenues, and growing transportation infrastructure needs. They noted there are twice as many projects in the State Transportation Improvement Program than funds available over the next five years. They said the problem is not NCDOT’s alone, but a problem for the nation, state, counties, cities/towns, and communities.
Updated the Committee on Executive Order #2 requiring NCDOT to change how they approve highway projects. BOT will approve a work program as a whole rather than approving individual projects.
I-485 Update
Interstate Maintenance – NCDOT advocated for saving money in the long run by investing in preserving Interstates. They are allocating $10 million to the effort and plan to increase it to $15 million or more in the future.
Bridges – NCDOT maintains 13,000 bridges and is 10th in the nation with respect to most deficient bridges. 8,000 need to be replaced in the next 20 years. NCDOT is currently replacing 100 per year. They are working to develop and include maintenance, preservation and rehabilitation strategies in the bridge program, streamline the program to deliver bridges quicker and cheaper, and develop bridge replacement standards for the sub-regional tier.
Revenues – NCDOT said we must develop new long range progrmas and resources in cooperation with all levels of government and transportation groups to achieve consensus and cooperation in moving our 21st Century state to a resionably resourced transprotation program instead of modal and regional fights over the allocation of an under resourced 20th Century transportation model.

BOT November Meeting

Submitted 11.11.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Board of Transportation, Transportation

Jim Humphrey attended the NC BOT meeting on Wednesday, November 4, 2009. Below are his notes. Thanks Jim for sharing!

Highlights

-The BOT will consider changing design standards and public notification processes/requirements for noise abatement walls in the next months. The long time between adoption of environmental documents and actual construction of NCDOT projects causes problems with citizens purchasing property along planned corridors. There was talk of increasing city, real estate agent and closing attorney accountability for sharing info but no decision was reached. There was a feeling that increased legislation will ultimately be required. Federal Standards are being revised and NCDOT must show their policy complies 6 months after the federal rules are finalized (federal rules are expected by mid 2009) A NCDOT Noise Barrier Aesthetics Committee will be formed to look at improved aesthetics for future and existing noise walls. Increased use of textures, colors and murals will likely be part of future recommendations.

-The legislature adopted legislation allowing cities and counties to permit golf carts on public roads. The NCDOT is developing requirements for use on state maintained streets and model ordinances for cities to consider. The NCLM is expected to assist in publicizing.

-The NCDOT is asking the BOT to authorize public hearing regarding potential changes allowing oversize/overweight transport of some loads on Sundays. Changes were requested by companies that move large boats.

-The nation’s first totally “green” airfield lighting (all runways) is being pursued at the Raleigh-Durham airfield thru use of LED lighting.

-The NCDOT will become more involved in Norfolk Southern and NC Railroad Board Meetings (and visa versa) in order to enhance partnerships.

-A Complete Streets Advisory Committee has been formed to assist the NCDOT in implementing it’s Complete Streets Policy. Tracy Newsome of Charlotte is the Vice-Chair.

-The NCDOT is looking seriously at tolling ferry operations to generate revenues.

-A draft Annual Report highlighting NCDOT’s accomplishments and shortfalls is complete and being reviewed by the BOT. The report will include a scorecard of progress on key accountabilities.

-A draft Ethics Policy has been distributed to board members for comments and approval.

NCDOT Presentation- Transportation: The Federal Outlook

Submitted 10.30.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Reauthorization, Rescission, SAFETEA-LU, Transportation

This is a presentation Susan Howard from the Governor’s D.C. office gave at the recent NCSITE Board meeting. Click here for the presentation.

NCDOT Transportation Intergovernmental Policy Advisory Group-Update

Submitted 10.29.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: NCDOT, TIPAG

Transportation Intergovernmental Advisory Group – Moving Forward

Meeting Facilitation Approach – NCDOT is recommending that the Department take on the responsibility of facilitating future Steering Committee meetings in lieu of hiring a consulting firm to provide these services.

10/22 Steering Committee Meeting Agenda:

I. Reconnect with Steering Committee Members (What’s working well, not so well, next steps, and roles and responsibilities)

o Steering Committee will select and prioritize specific topic areas to review (complete)

o Steering Committee will define and agree on general parameters for each work group created (i.e., subtopic to be addressed, general scope of project, expected outcomes, timeline to complete, and number and type of work group members to involve)

o Two Steering Committee members (NCDOT representative and External Partner representative) will be appointed to serve as Co-Sponsors for each work group

o Steering Committee members will make recommendations to co-sponsors regarding potential work group members

o Steering Committee will meet quarterly and have a set agenda to facilitate meeting progress and work group reporting

II. New Work Group Development (including roles and responsibilities of Steering Committee)

o Work group Co-Sponsors will be responsible for selecting work group members (5-7 members), providing direction, resourcing work group, answering questions/making decisions, and providing quarterly progress updates to Steering Committee

Recommended Work Group Topics

1. Topic Area: Education and Communication

Sub-topic: Communications with elected officials

Focus Question: What communication policies are currently in place for mayors and County Commissioner Chairs, etc. and how could they be improved?

o Co-Sponsors- Ted Vaden / Julie White

o Proposed Tasks –

o Establish a standing method for local officials to communicate and be educated related to Transportation issues, policy and concerns

o Determine what communication policies are currently in place for mayors and county commission chairs, etc. and how could they be improved?

o Determine what education needs exist within this stakeholder group and develop recommendations to meet those needs

o Timeline – Report results back to the committee 1st quarter 2010

2. Topic Area: Future transportation funding strategy.

Sub-topic: Federal Reauthorization

Focus Question: How do we need to be working together to most effectively review and plan for the future transportation funding needs of the State?

o Co-Sponsors – Susan Coward / Mike Kozlosky

o Proposed Tasks -

o Develop a plan to respond and react to future reauthorization legislation and activities

o Develop a process for managing communications and other information flow

o Develop a plan to improve advocacy between stakeholder groups for; (a) funding flexibility (b) sustained revenue sources

o Timeline – Report results back to the committee 1st quarter 2010

3. Topic Area: Reduce land use and transportation disconnect.

Sub-topic: Process Improvement Tools

Focus Question: What type processes or products do we need to develop to better ensure effective agency coordination and communications occurs early on in the life of any new transportation and/or land development project?

o Co-Sponsors – Terry Gibson / Mike Horn

o Proposed Tasks –

o Develop new project notification procedure and guideline to assist local governments and NCDOT with more effective transportation/land development communications and coordination

o Timeline – Report results back to the committee 1st quarter 2010

III. Follow-up Action Items and Next Meeting Date

- Steering Committee Members provide suggested work group member names to Co-Sponsors by 10/29

- Co-Sponsors develop scope of work for work group and select work group members by 11/5 (send to all Steering Committee members when complete for review/input)

- Kick-off meeting of work groups by 11/26

- Next Steering Committee Meeting – 1/25/10 – 10 AM – Quorum Center

NCDOT Presentation on Complete Streets Policy

Submitted 10.19.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Complete Streets, Transportation

I attended the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Coordinating Committee meeting Friday where Charlotte Transportation Director Danny Pleasant shared the local perspective and NCDOT Deputy Secretary Jim Westmoreland the NCDOT perspective on NCDOT’s new Complete Streets Policy. You can view both presentation’s by clicking here.

Apportionment of Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Funds Under a 31-Day Extension of Surface Transportation Programs Pursuant to Public Law 111-68

Submitted 10.14.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: SAFETEA-LU, Transportation

Apportionment of Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Funds Under a 31-Day Extension of Surface Transportation Programs Pursuant to Public Law 111-68

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/notices/n4510713.htm

NC Board of Transportation Meeting Oct. 7, 2009

Submitted 10.13.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Board of Transportation, Transportation

NC Board of Transportation Meeting Oct. 7, 2009
Key Information by Jim Humphrey, City of Charlotte

1. The NCDOT has responded to comments regarding it’s draft Subdivision Roads Manual. The manual regulates the design of subdivision/secondary roads. Copies of the manual and NCDOT response were handed to board members. They will be asked to approve the manual at the November meeting. I indicated to Dilbert Roddenbury, state Secondary Roads Manager, that Charlotte staff continues to have concerns.

2. Ethics rules have been changed for NCDOT to effectively not allow them to accept any gift, even if they have no role in selecting vendors. The BOT and staff will undergo training. I understand that they will not even be allowed to travel with someone outside the department.

3. NCDOT staff will be implementing a process to develop a draft Sustainability Action Plan. A senior management advisory group will be formed to oversee the process. Work will start immediately and the draft Action Plan should be developed soon after the first of next year. Lacy Love heads this initiative.

4. Revenues and spending at NCDOT are down. The revenue shortfall (2% down) was expected. The department plans to gear up work to spend available funds.

5. Mark Foster explained federal rescission. The current rescission is larger than in the past ($250m) but will not affect any existing TIP projects. Some of the rules have been changed which result in reducing flexibility NCDOT has had in the past regarding how to manage funding cuts. NC had the 10th largest rescission.

6. Powell Bill funds were distributed to 507 cities/towns. Revenues were down 4% from last year.

7. Don Lee, State Roadside Environmental Engineer, discussed the state’s first “Green” Rest Area located on US 421 in Wilkes County. It includes bio-retention, Xeriscape landscaping strategies, special lighting, geothermal heating/cooling and many other features. I was particularly impressed with the degree of monitoring/evaluation that was being done/planned. I will send info to Charlotte’s Building Management/Construction folks. Other cities may find this subject of interest.

8. Kevin Lacy and Sara O’Brien gave an overview of the 2009 Safe Routes to Schools funding allocations which provides $15.6m for infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects. All Divisions in the state have projects.

9. Tom Norman, state Pedestrian and Bicycling Manager indicated they are monitoring many stimulus projects across the state. They are encountering problems because designs submitted to them are creating liability and safety issues. For example, not meeting ADA requirements. He feels training to municipalities is needed. He also indicated the first regional bicycle plan nears completion for the Lake Norman area. The next plan to be developed will be in the New Bern area.

10. Rodger Rochelle, Transportation Management Branch Manager, presented info on a public/private partnership for staffing a visitor center in Randolph Counties. A private provider staffs and maintains the facility at no cost to the NCDOT using money received from leasing/renting private sponsorship space.

11. On a Charlotte note, Miriam Perry indicated the NCDOT share of funding for engineering work for the Blue Line to NE Charlotte was on the Board’s agenda for approval. There was also a grant for some work at the Eastland Station.

12. David Joynor’s wife died. David heads the NC Turnpike Authority.

13. Future items on the Safety and Emerging Issues Committee include Improving the Appearance of Noise Walls and Rules Governing Golf Carts on Public Roads.

How will the rescission effect specific North Carolina transportation programs?

Submitted 10.01.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Rescission, SAFETEA-LU, Transportation

Click below to see the table that shows how the rescission will be allocated across our programs. Click here.

FAQs

More FAQs

Chart

PL and STP-Da unprogrammed money

The Countdown Clock Is On for Federal Transportation Funding

Submitted 09.30.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Rescission, SAFETEA-LU, Transportation

Here’s the latest and greatest out of DC.

The Continuing Appropriations Resolution (CR), passed by the House and being debated in the Senate today, should be voted on at 5:30pm. This is the bill to fund the federal government whose fiscal year ends tonight and begins anew tomorrow, October 1^st. Through a technical mishap, the one month extension of federal highway money is not included at this point.

In order for the one month extension to be a part of the CR the Senate must have unanimous consent to allow a vote on H. Con. Res. 191. If this does not happen federal transportation funding will be cut off tomorrow.

Now the “unless.” The Senate is also trying to negotiate unanimous consent to allow a vote today to extend federal transportation funding for three months in a separate bill. This is considered more of a long shot.

Might this three month extension bill include a repeal of the rescission? The House has said they will only consider legislation from the Senate on the repeal that includes a $490m offsetting spending reduction to cover the cost.

I will let you know what happens at the end of the day!

Julie

Study Committee to look at Transportation Equity Formula Appointed

Submitted 09.24.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Equity Formula, Study, Transportation

The Studies Act of 2009 (HB 945) called for the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee to study the way the State distributes transportation funding across the State before the start of the short session in May 2010. The Speaker made his appointments this week to the Committee which means they can now officially begin to meet. Membership of the Joint Committee is below.

If you are represented by a member of this Joint Committee please write a letter and/or call your legislator and strongly encourage them to convene and begin the study.

If you are not represented by a member of this Joint Committee please write a letter and/or call your legislator and ask them to speak with their peers on the Committee and encourage them to begin the study.

HOUSE APPOINTMENTS

Rep. E. Nelson Cole (Co-Chair)
Rep. Kelly M. Alexander, Jr.
Rep. Becky Carney
Rep. Lorene Thomason Coates
Rep. James Walker Crawford, Jr.
Rep. William A. Current, Sr.
Rep. Robert Mitchell Gillespie
Rep. Grier Martin
Rep. Daniel Francis McComas
Rep. Lucy T. Allen (Advisory Member)
Rep. Arthur J. Williams (Advisory Member)

SENATE APPOINTMENTS

Sen. Steve Goss (Co-Chair)
Sen. Philip Edward Berger
Sen. David W. Hoyle
Sen. Neal Hunt
Sen. Samuel Clark Jenkins
Sen. Anthony Eden Rand
Sen. John J. Snow, Jr.
Sen. Richard Yates Stevens

Transforming into the Good Transportation State

Submitted 09.23.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: NC Go, Revenue, Transportation

NC Go! recently released a report that reflects a compilation of several studies issued recently regarding highway safety and the costs of poor roads, bridges and traffic congestion. Additional information from the NC Department of Transportation on road and bridge conditions and recovery funds provides further context for the discussion on the current status of transportation in North Carolina.

At the conclusion of the report they provide several options available to the state in planning to meet future revenue needs. NC Go! does not favor any single plan over another, but simply suggests all options be considered and that any solution be equitable in gauging how each user pays for their share of highway, bridge and public transportation consumption.

Sept. 2nd Board of Transportation Meeting

Submitted 09.18.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Board of Transportation, Transportation

Sept. 2nd Board of Transportation Meeting

*Thanks to Jim Humphrey with the City of Charlotte for sharing these notes he took at the meeting.

Draft Project Prioritization Process for Urban Loops-Don Voelker gave a presentation emphasizing the draft nature. He listed 6 principles guiding development including support statewide growth, data driven and transparent, consistent with overall strategic prioritization process (i.e. for non loop projects), include benefit/cost, subject to public review and allow Secretary of DOT to have ability to change ranking (but he will have to explain basis). Project will be scored utilizing need and benefit factors. Need factors and their potential scoring emphasis included congestion (high), safety (low) and pavement condition (low). Benefit factors included travel time saving (high), environmental readiness (low to medium), air quality (medium to high), economic development potential (high), freight movement (medium), multimodal (medium) and land use (medium). The rating for economic development is determined based upon Dept of Commerce info. Ultimately projects across the state will be compared based upon their “Priority Ratio” which is their Need Factors score plus Benefit Factors score divided by the project cost. It was stated other factors that will be considered in scheduling projects include build useable segments (is it a segment that begins and ends in a logical place), avoid lapse in planning documents, paying for cash flow for projects started in previous years, apply funds based upon favorable construction conditions (low construction cost due to contractor availability) and the amount of non-loop (non-DOT funds) funding provided (such as thru public/private, TIFIA, Tolls, etc.). The implementation schedule includes production of a pilot report outlining the methodology, BOT input, MPO input from loop areas, a 30 day comment period via the web site and finalization in the spring of 2010 (presumably so the new method could be used in prioritization of new loop projects, not current loop projects, for the new 5 Year Work Program). Don’s presentation should be on the NCDOT web site.

Sustainability-Lacy Love updated the Environment and Planning Committee regarding a “Sustainability in Transportation” peer exchange he and others from NCDOT attended sponsored by USDOT and others. He spoke of the “triple bottom line” approach to sustainability by evaluating performance on the basis of economic, social and environmental impacts and allocating equal consideration to these driving forces in project and operational decisions. He stated next steps for NCDOT included clarifying what sustainability means to NCDOT and their role, inventorying what they already do since some actions already consider sustainable criteria (example, LED signals) and continuing dialog with AASHTO, local communities and other resource agencies regarding their efforts. The presentation was for information only at this point, but it seems clear NCDOT is very interested in pursuing the concept. If you want to see an example, the state of Washington produces a sustainability report each year which is probably on their web site. Lacy’s presentation should be on the DOT website.

New Federal Rules on Mitigation-Bill Gilmore updated the Safety and Emerging Issues Committee on new rules which the NCDOT must comply with by June 2010. A copy of Bill’s presentation should be on the NCDOT web site.

Legislative Update-Johanna Reese updated the group on a number of bills and other legislation. Some of the info that I highlight include (pardon me if the bill numbers are incorrect) HB 881 which among other things authorizes the DOT to sell salt and stone to municipalities and counties, SB 648 which allows the NCDOT to pay developers directly for road improvements, HB 12 which clarifies how GARVEE funds will be accounted for in Equity Formula calculations, HB 148 (Intermodal Bill) that authorizes sales tax and other revenue options for transit, HB 1617 that places the Turnpike Authority in NCDOT, SB 200 which puts a floor on the gas tax and SB 750 which clarifies gap funds which the legislature authorized for the NCTA will not be subject to the equity formula. It was mentioned that a statewide bill was approved that allows golf carts on public roads under certain conditions and authorizes local fees for licensing (no bill number was given). Johanna indicated a number of studies were authorized (but not mandated) on subjects such as the Equity Formula, reducing costs via various paving methods, and tolling at state lines.

Complete Streets-Tom Norman indicated a process will be presented to senior DOT leadership for approval soon which suggests a DOT and Stakeholder group (including municipalities and MPOs) be formed to develop a complete streets workbook that could be given to stakeholders. Timetable for production of the workbook is 12 months. He also mentioned a goal to change DOT geometric and design standards so they better align with the complete street philosophy. Quarterly updates will be given to the Multimodal Committee regarding DOT efforts to pursue the complete streets philosophy and measures will be developed.

Bide and Ped Applications-Tom Norman indicated that this Friday the NCDOT will call for applications for Bike and Ped planning grants. 90 communities now have Bike and Ped Plans. In the future, cities that have Bike and Ped plans will be more likely to receive bike and ped funding.

I-85 Corridor Study/Yadkin River Bridge-Jim Trogden mentioned the NCDOT had begun soliciting contractors for the design/build project submitted for Stimulus discressionary money. I believe the NCDOT wants to have a contractor chosen and ready to begin work in the event project funding is authorized by the feds. Jim indicated he expects the state to “fare well” on it’s application (a similar indication was stated in his remarks at the recent Metro Mayors luncheon in Concord).

5 Year Work Plan-Board was given an update of work to develop a 5 year work plan. An interim 5 year work plan was handed to Board members which essentially takes current projects and initiatives and places them in a new format. Major sections of the plan/format include a timetable for developing 20, 10 and 5 year programs, a summary of program areas and where all transportation funds go, a summary of expenditures (by mode, tier and region), a detailed project listing (by division, mode and TIP number), project support costs, operations and maintenance summary, administrative funding, listing of where other DOT funds are going and targets for measuring successful administration of the budget. The interim work plan is intended to be in place until the Board approves a new work plan next May. Jim Trogden indicated it merely contained what they are currently doing and working on and that it did not have a strategic focus. MPOs and localities will be invited to comment on the new format and will be involved in development of the new work plan. I do not know if the interim work plan is on the DOT web site.

I was unable to attend the Rail and Transit Committees meetings. The TIP Committee did not meet.

UPDATE: NC to lose $249m in unspent Federal Highway Program Funding

Submitted 09.18.09 | Comments (1)

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Rescission, SAFETEA-LU, Transportation

UPDATE: House Approves 3-Month Authorization Extension; Does Not Address Rescissions

UPDATE: Here’s the latest (and it is changing minute to minute). The House bill, H3617, is a three month extension of SAFETEA-LU without a repeal of the rescission. It was calendared to be heard today, but was pulled from the calendar because of a lack of support for the three month time frame.

The Senate has a bill ready, but not yet filed, with an eighteen month extension and a repeal of the rescission. I hear the White House supports this bill.

I am told the hang up on repealing the rescission is the price tag, as the money would have to come from another source or contribute to the deficit.

Congress must pass something by September 30 or SAFETEA-LU ceases to exist, so there is talk of adding a one month extension (without repeal of the rescission) to the House’s FY2010 Fiscal Appropriation Continuing Resolution which has to pass by the 30th. That bill has not been filed yet either, but when it is, I will include a hyperlink here.

Click here for the letter from High Point

Click here for the letter from Charlotte

Click here for the Durham, Chapel Hill, Carrboro MPO letter

Click here for letter from Fayetteville

Click here for sample letter to Congressional Delegation from Greensboro

Click here for a copy of the letter from the City of Concord

Click here for the letter from the NC Assoc. of MPOs

Click here for a copy of the letter from Sec. Conti

North Carolina is slated to lose $249 million of unspent Federal Highway Program funding effective September 29^th if Congress does not act before then. SAFETEA-LU (federal surface transportation authorization legislation), which expires September 30, 2009, includes a provision for a major rescission of Federal High Highway Funds. (A rescission is a cut in previously approved funding levels taken out of unused.) This cut will be made on September 29, 2009 if Congress does not act to eliminate the rescission provision.

This loss will affect all federal highway funding programs and represents a 27% reduction in North Carolina’s annual federal highway fund appropriation. In addition, the funds also encompass the STP DA funds that are directed at urbanized areas over 200,000. Below is a table representing the potential hit to those cities:

North Carolina

Asheville $1,008,869

Charlotte $3,345,647

Durham $1,310,415

Fayetteville $1,258,380

Greensboro $1,219,750

Raleigh $2,465,722

Winston-Salem $1,362,750

Total $11,971,533

We are strongly encouraging you to write and call the North Carolina Congressional Delegation and ask them to eliminate the rescission. The clock is ticking as the rescission is effective in just over a week. Please act quickly.

David Hyder says:

September 23, 2009 at 2:23 pm

I’m not surprised. Who are they trying to kid. Price has not been an issue up to this point.

NCDOT TIPAG Policy Workgroup Topics

Submitted 09.15.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Post, Transportation
Tags: NCDOT, TIPAG

At our meeting on Monday, September 21 we will be choosing one or two Intergovernmental Policy Workgroup Topics for consideration and action from the list of ideas the group generated at our last meeting which can be found in this report. Leave me a comment on which two you think are the most important for NCDOT and cities to work on together going forward. I will share your feedback with the group next week.

NCDOT Transportation Intergovernmental Policy Advisory Group

Submitted 09.15.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: Census, communications, intergovernmental, land use planning, NCDOT, steering, TIPAG

NCDOT has created a Transportation Intergovernmental Policy Advisory Group (TIPAG) the purpose of which is to identify opportunities for transportation stakeholders, local governments, and the Department to work more effectively together in the planning and implementing of long-range plans including land use and transportation. Click here for the Power Point on the TIPAG.

The Policy Group Steering Committee members include:
NC League of Municipalities
Paul Meyer & Julie White

NC Association of County Commissioners
Kevin Leonard

NC MPO Association
Mike Kozlosky

NC RPO Association
Hannah Cockburn

NC Council of Governments Association
Betty Huskins

Contractor Representative
Mike Horn, Kimley-Horn & Associates

NCDOT Management Team
Jim Trogdon, Chief Operating Officer
Susan Coward, Deputy Secretary Intergovernmental Affairs and Budget Coordination
Mark Foster, Chief Financial Officer
Jim Westmoreland, Deputy Secretary for Transit
Terry Gibson, State Highway Administrator
Mark Tyler, Director of Governance Office

Here’s the Game Plan.

Several key points for this advisory group include:

The Perdue Administration, NCDOT Secretary Gene Conti, and the entire management team at NCDOT are committed to working collaboratively with local governments.

Several studies and commissions have cited the need to improve policy and working relations between NCDOT and local governments. Recently, 21st Century Transportation Committee recommended a cooperative and collaborative working relationship between NCDOT and local governments.

The Legislatively appointed Committee noted that NCDOT should assist local governments in coordinating land-use and transportation planning and that NCDOT should explore opportunities for improved delivery and efficiency of existing transportation services by working with the state local government associations (NCLM, NCACC, etc).

The group is scheduled to meet on (links to summary of meeting):

September 21, 2009.

April 26, 2010 and Action Plan

July 26, 2010 and NCDOT Update Presented at Meeting

Subgroups were created. Click on the title to see the work plan and membership of each work group.

Land Use Planning

Communications and Education – Membership, May 13 agenda, May 13 meeting minutes, NCDOT Manager Survey, Local Government Elected Official Survey, Local Government Transportation Staff Survey, Summary of Survey Highlights, Summary of Text Comments

Reauthorization of SAFETEA-LU

Census Boundaries

Article on VMT

Submitted 09.15.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: VMT

Here is an interesting article from Rebuilding America’s Future on the Vehicle Miles Traveled Tax (VMT).

GAO Report on Enhancing MPOs

Submitted 09.15.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Daily clips, News, Transportation
Tags: MPO

Link to the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report identifying options to enhance the MPO transportation planning process.

Seek a local option sales tax for local transportation needs

Submitted 08.26.09 | No Comments »

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation

HB148- Congestion Relief/Intermodal Transport Fund

Lawmakers gave final approval late Monday, August 10, 2009, to legislation that would allow Triangle and Triad counties to raise the sales tax to pay for light rail and more buses. The House voted 73 to 40 to let Wake, Orange, Durham, Guilford and Forsyth counties boost the sales tax by 1/2 percentage point, if voters approve. The legislation would also allow every other county, except Mecklenburg, to vote on a 1/4-cent transit tax increase. Mecklenburg already has a 1/2-cent transit tax added to its sales tax rate. The bill also authorizes transit authorities to increase car registration fees by up to $7 per vehicle to $10.

Roads, Revenues and Responsibilities

Submitted 08.13.09 | Comments (7)

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation

Bills would transfer secondary road maintenance to counties or cities.

Metro Mayors says:

August 13, 2009 at 2:45 pm

Roads and Municipalities Sample Resolution
Metro Mayors says:

August 14, 2009 at 12:46 pm

Road funding bill has officials worried over what ‘may’ happen.
Metro Mayors says:

August 26, 2009 at 2:29 pm

State looks to shift road maintenance to cities.
Metro Mayors says:

August 26, 2009 at 2:30 pm

Bills make road upkeep a political hot potato.
Metro Mayors says:

August 26, 2009 at 2:30 pm

Secondary roads bill shelved for now.
Metro Mayors says:

August 26, 2009 at 2:31 pm

For 80 years, state government has planned, designed, built and maintained almost all of North Carolina’s roads and highways. Unless individual counties or municipalities pursue responsibility for their own roads, this system should not change.
Metro Mayors says:

August 26, 2009 at 2:32 pm

Shifting secondary road costs to cities, counties no solution

Begin a statewide dialogue on metropolitan multimodal transportation funding solutions

Submitted 08.12.09 | Comments (4)

Category Advocacy Agenda, Transportation
Tags: funding, metropolitan, multimodal, roads, solutions, Transportation

HB237: Equity Formula Study Commission

Metro Mayors says:

August 12, 2009 at 2:33 pm

SB635: Equity Formula Study Commission
Metro Mayors says:

August 14, 2009 at 9:13 am

HB945-The Studies Act of 2009: Transportation Funding Distribution Formula
Metro Mayors says:

August 26, 2009 at 11:36 am

Metro Mayors Release White Paper on State Transportation Funding Distribution Formula
Metro Mayors says:

August 26, 2009 at 2:08 pm

New roads chief wades into old fight

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply